🔗 Share this article

The count of guaranteed positions for Māori representatives on New Zealand councils will be cut by more than half, after a divisive law change that required municipal councils to put the future of hard-earned Indigenous wards to a public vote.

Background Information on Indigenous Representation

Indigenous electoral districts, which can include multiple elected officials depending on demographic data, were established in 2001 to provide Indigenous voters the choice to elect a assured Indigenous council member in local and regional authorities. Originally, local governments were only able to establish a Māori ward by initially submitting it to a public vote in their region. Local populations frequently devoted considerable time building community backing and pushing their local governments to create Māori wards.

Policy Changes and Government Actions

To remedy the issue, the former administration allowed local councils to establish a Indigenous seat without initially mandating them to put it to a popular ballot.

However, this year, the current administration reversed the change, saying local residents ought to determine whether to establish Indigenous representation.

Voting Outcomes

The new legislation required councils that had created a ward under Labour’s rules to conduct binding referendums alongside the municipal polls, which concluded on 11 October. Out of 42 local governments participating in the referendum, 17 voted to keep their wards, and 25 to disestablish theirs – showing numerous areas opposed to reserved Indigenous seats.

The results represented “a crucial move in restoring community self-determination.”

Opposition parties nevertheless have criticised the government’s law change as “racist” and “against Indigenous interests”. Since taking office, the coalition government has ushered in extensive reversals to policies intended to improve Indigenous welfare and political inclusion. The government has said it aims to terminate “race-based” approaches, and says it is committed to improving outcomes for Indigenous people and every citizen.

Urban-Rural Divide

Outcomes of the public votes were split down urban-rural lines – six of the seven urban centers required to vote backed Māori wards, while countryside areas skewed heavily towards removing them.

“It’s a real shame for the Indigenous seats that had recently been established – they’re only just starting to hit their stride.”

Voter Turnout and Concerns

This year’s local government elections recorded the smallest electoral participation in over three decades, with under one-third of eligible voters casting a vote, leading to calls for an overhaul.

This approach had been “a mockery”.

Comparative Treatment

Local governments are able to create different electoral districts – such as countryside seats – without initially mandating a community ballot. The different conditions placed on Indigenous representation suggested the government was targeting Indigenous inclusion.

“Ultimately, they were unsuccessful. Numerous localities have expressed strong opposition.”

This remark referred to the 17 regions that voted to retain their seats.