🔗 Share this article

The composer Avril Coleridge-Taylor always experienced the burden of her parent’s legacy. As the daughter of Samuel Coleridge-Taylor, one of the best-known British artists of the 1900s, her name was shrouded in the long shadows of bygone eras.

An Inaugural Recording

Earlier this year, I reflected on these legacies as I prepared to produce the first-ever recording of her concerto for piano composed in 1936. With its emotional harmonies, expressive melodies, and confident beats, this piece will offer music lovers valuable perspective into how she – an artist in conflict who entered the world in 1903 – imagined her reality as a female composer of color.

Legacy and Reality

But here’s the thing about shadows. It can take a while to adapt, to see shapes as they actually appear, to separate fact from distortion, and I had been afraid to address Avril’s past for a while.

I deeply hoped her to be her father’s daughter. In some ways, this was true. The idyllic English tones of Samuel’s influence can be observed in many of her works, including From the Hills (1934) and Sussex Landscape (1940). But you only have to examine the headings of her family’s music to realize how he viewed himself as not just a standard-bearer of British Romantic style and also a advocate of the Black diaspora.

At this point father and daughter began to differ.

White America evaluated Samuel by the mastery of his music rather than the his ethnicity.

Samuel’s African Roots

As a student at the Royal College of Music, Samuel – the child of a parent from Sierra Leone and a British mother – began embracing his background. When the poet of color the renowned Dunbar arrived in England in that era, the 21-year-old composer actively pursued him. He composed Dunbar’s African Romances into music and the subsequent year incorporated his poetry for a stage piece, Dream Lovers. Then came the choral composition that established his reputation: Hiawatha’s Wedding Feast.

Based on Henry Wadsworth Longfellow’s The Song of Hiawatha, this composition was an global success, especially with Black Americans who felt shared pride as white America assessed his work by the quality of his music instead of the his background.

Principles and Actions

Recognition failed to diminish Samuel’s politics. In 1900, he was present at the First Pan African Conference in the UK where he made the acquaintance of the Black American thinker this influential figure and observed a range of talks, covering the subjugation of African people in South Africa. He was a campaigner to his final days. He kept connections with early civil rights leaders like this intellectual and Booker T Washington, gave addresses on equality for all, and even engaged in dialogue on issues of racism with the American leader on a trip to the White House in the early 1900s. As for his music, Du Bois recalled, “he made his mark so notably as a musician that it will long be remembered.” He passed away in that year, aged 37. However, how would Samuel have thought of his offspring’s move to travel to this country in the that decade?

Controversy and Apartheid

“Offspring of Renowned Musician gives OK to South African policy,” ran a headline in the community journal Jet magazine. This policy “seems to me the appropriate course”, the composer stated Jet. When pushed to clarify, she revised her statement: she did not support with this policy “in principle” and it “could be left to work itself out, guided by benevolent South Africans of every background”. Were the composer more attuned to her father’s politics, or from the US under segregation, she may have reconsidered about the policy. Yet her life had protected her.

Identity and Naivety

“I have a UK passport,” she remarked, “and the government agents did not inquire me about my background.” So, with her “fair” appearance (according to the magazine), she moved within European circles, supported by their admiration for her renowned family member. She presented about her father’s music at the Cape Town university and led the broadcasting ensemble in that location, featuring the bold final section of her concerto, titled: “Dedicated to my Father.” Although a accomplished player herself, she did not perform as the featured artist in her piece. Rather, she invariably directed as the conductor; and so the orchestra of the era performed under her direction.

She desired, according to her, she “could introduce a change”. But by 1954, circumstances deteriorated. When government agents discovered her African heritage, she could no longer stay the country. Her British passport offered no defense, the British high commissioner urged her to go or risk imprisonment. She came home, embarrassed as the magnitude of her inexperience became clear. “The lesson was a difficult one,” she stated. Adding to her disgrace was the printing that year of her ill-fated Jet interview, a year after her unceremonious exit from that nation.

A Familiar Story

Upon contemplating with these shadows, I perceived a known narrative. The account of holding UK citizenship until it’s revoked – which recalls troops of color who defended the UK in the second world war and lived only to be not given their earned rewards. Including those from Windrush,